Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Norway, Islamic Fundamentalism, and Islamophobia

I remember returning to the US in 1998 after an extended visit to Europe and other parts of the world. It was like returning to an alternate or parallel universe. Other parts of the world were gripped and inundated at the time by the fractious and debilitating crises in the Balkans rife with ethnic cleansing, annihilation of innocent men, women and children by nationalism run amok.
In the US, the only news on television and cable was in the putrid scandal of the Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal and his (Clinton's) eventual impeachment. I realized then that once the US is consumed by the "news of the hour" there is other-worldly distance placed on less intriguing news, especially if they are of the international variety. Case in point would be the Casey Anthony legal spectacle that gripped this nation about a month ago. Our national obsession of this debacle was spectacularly disturbing. Recently, the Debt Ceiling debate was the most recent. The point is not in the following of these important stories, but the other major news-worthy items that we lose in the process, especially on its importance to the ordinary citizens.
One such epochal event was the massacre in Norway on July 22. This story was severely under-reported and under-analyzed in the US, especially for its far-reaching global implications.
The very fact that Norway, one of the most peaceful havens on this planet, could come under such draconian attack by what is likely to be a sole attacker is hugely disturbing on so many levels.
Ironically, the killer, Anders Behring Breivik, cited the Balkan conflict as the event that kindled his anti-Islamic bent that led to his massacre of over 90 innocent people in Norway. He rails against multiculturalists for condoning and accepting Muslims into European societies. He believes this would be the death knell to his beloved Continent if they (Muslims) are not resisted and expelled from Europe. So entrenched was he in his convictions that he staged an elaborately maniacal and diabolical exercise that has probably scarred a nation as peaceful as Norway - probably forever.
The purpose of this blog is to highlight a few of my thoughts on this matter. For starters, the fear of Islamic Fundamentalism is real. We cannot talk or analyze enough the loss of innocence America and Americans felt and continue to feel after the horrendous attack on 09/11. It changed our lives and our world in ways that we are still trying to piece together. Then the 07/07 attacks in the UK further entrenched this phenomenon by showing that any and everyone can be touched by Islamists. In the last few years, we have watched with horror as hitherto peaceful countries have felt the garish attacks of fundamentalists in Denmark, Sweden, and many regions in Africa. Who can deny the fact that the Fort Hood shooting in November 5, 2009 by a US Army Major that killed 14 people or the recently averted massacre by Private First Class Naser Jason Abdo are real threats to the fabric of our societal sanity?
It is the response to these brutal attacks that has me wondering if we are losing our "collective souls" to this deepening problem. What I mean is this: All over Europe, there seems to be an upsurge in Nationalist  and a revival of Revanchist and Right Wing Movements. I remember watching the Republican Presidential debate recently in which Herman Cain was given a standing ovation for his anti-Islamic sentiments. There is a wave of anti-Mosque sentiments in which many Americans are chillingly against anything Islam in their communities - at epitomized by the debates in New York and Tennessee. There is even a catalog of fear and rumor mongering amongst our politicians on the establishment of Sharia Law as a potential replacement to the American Constitution.
The question is: What kind of people are we becoming - in the US, Europe and the rest of the world - when the solution to Islamic Fundamentalism is to fight hate with hate? Nothing good can ever come out of embracing the Breiviks of the world as they open us up to morphing into the very calluses we are trying to eradicate. Also as important is the fact that there has to be a demarcation between Islam and Islamists. My faith is Christian but I know that to paint a general brushstroke on all adherents of the Islamic religion as terrorists is not only calamitous but dangerously ignorant.
This blog is not necessarily about creating a panacea on how to defeat this growing scourge and menace to our world. But it is more of a plea on keeping our wits about and appealing to our "better angels". Breivik was so consumed by hate for the Muslim world that his only solution was to take the lives of youngsters and innocents who were looking to perform their civic duties in a camp for budding politicians and activists. There is a groundswell of support for Breivik - not necessarily for his actions - but for what many feel should be a wake-up call to the threat of Islam and Islamists.
I don't agree that we should necessarily be afraid of Muslims because of the actions of a few deviants and miscreants. We are better than this. By "We" I mean the rest of humanity who seek peace, equality and justice. If we choose to fight this problem of Islamic Fundamentalism with Islamophobia, we would destroy our innocence and create a rift in our individual countries like the Norwegians have to deal with right now. This is a country that just lost its innocence - and maybe its soul. By the act of one man filled with hate.      

2 comments:

  1. Refreshing to hear a non-partisan perspective on political goings-on! I absolutely hate to listen to political debates - it's like watching two children fight over a toy - neither one can consider the rights or perspective of the other one - just adament that their rights are being trod on, and will fight to the death for their own stance (even when they forget why they felt so strongly in the first place). I feel the same involuntary eye-rolling reaction with political debate, and just tune them both out! I can actually sit down to read what you have to say without wading through mud-slinging & name-calling. So thanks for delivering your perspective within a pallable dose of civility and rationality - that will maybe help people like me, who may not have the interest/patience/tollerance to sort through the heated exchanges on political tv, to actually have some thoughtful conversations on politics every now and then.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice to be back in your fold Sensus Communis . Your views on the topic is typical , and correct , especially on a subject that touches a lot of raw nerves.
    On a daily bases , in my observation of events in different walks of life , i notice ever more how different humans are with their approach to matters. It is very hard to find people who genuinely care for everyone , maybe because there are very few matters that really concern everyone ; life is largely a game of winners and losers. I suppose the optics to these issues you touch upon come in this paragraph.

    Islamic Fundamentalism , Main stream islam , Extreme right-wing views shall always have their audience ; so too those of secular society. The point is ; sections of society only pay attention when it directly affects them - positively or negatively ; that's why i tend to think the American media may not have had extensive coverage of The Breivik case.

    Yes , The west should not tar every muslim with the same brush. There are millions from that faith that hate violence , and are deserving of respect. Unfortunately , human nature is prone to stereotyping..... the challenge for these two cultures is to close ranks , and let the extremists be ever more isolated. It has to be a two-way street - there should be no room for self-pity , sympathy , nor superior- complex.

    As for BREIVIK , his actions confirm that violence and hate is not confined to one particular section in this struggle . Mankind can only claim to be civilized when it has managed to suppress his instinct to see a fellow human bleed , just because of a fundermental disagreement. My question is : what gives you the right ? are you the owner of the world ?

    ReplyDelete